Archive for May, 2009

The Nerds are Arming themselves!

Thursday, May 21st, 2009

Fortunately for the rest of us, they’ll never overcome their game-universe rivalries in order to band together, or we’d have a real problem on our hands.  Also, the fact that they’ve decided to arm themselves with precise replicas from video games and comic books pretty much wins the battle for our side, as you’ll see from the videos below.

#3 – Retractable Wolverine claws: These are actually pretty cool, and would make great accessories for Halloween.  The guy might even seem dangerous were it not for his having chosen to demonstrate his weapons by leaping (with the help of a discreetly placed exercise trampoline in the background, you’ll notice) fiercely at an unsuspecting cardboard box perched precariously on a cheap barstool in his dorm room.

#2 – Lancer Rifle with Chainsaw Bayonet (Gears of War): This is probably the most overtly dangerous one of the bunch, as it fires actual bullets.  However, as the pumpkins aptly demonstrate, if you hold perfectly still, the wielder stands pretty much a .0001% chance of actually hitting you as he’s rushing toward you and firing into the log at your feet.  When he gets close enough to use the “chainsaw bayonet” you might be in trouble, so I recommend using the convenient pause in combat while he starts up the little motor on his mom’s limb trimmer to either run away or kick the guy in his man parts.

#1 – Cloud Buster Sword (Final Fantasy 7): Again, the first impression is very menacing, especially with the straight from the highlands Scottish blacksmith guy running at you and screaming with that giant sword.  But wait for it…wait for it…The real danger here is when he gets you laughing so hard that you forget to dodge during one of the 30 second periods during which he’s working the blade into what you might call a swing.

So know this, nerds: I’M ON TO YOU!

Stick and Move, Old School

Wednesday, May 13th, 2009

I’ve resisted all the hype around the latest generation of video game consoles up to this point, but this one commercial might have just convinced me to get a Wii.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEaL8HqufFI

Star Trek Goes Boldly

Monday, May 11th, 2009

Review: Star Trek

MightyThor’s Rating: 4 / 5 Starfleet Insignias

Maltz!  Chaaaaaa nee choo!

On Friday night I did something I haven’t done in some time: I braved the opening night crowds to see a major summer blockbuster, in this case the new Star Trek from J.J. Abrams.  The question you, Word readers, are surely asking is, “Was it worth it?”

I’d have to say yes it was.

I’ve heard this film referred to as this year’s Iron Man, and that’s a description that I can get on board with, because like last year’s Iron Man, this was a big summer blockbuster that had some flaws, but overall was really entertaining.  It was very well-cast, well-paced, funny at times, and full of good action.  It avoided getting too heavy or philosophical, which would have been easy to do.  It made fun of its own ancestry in a respectful way.  But the main reason that I liked it was that it was bold. Unfortunately, this also led to one of the main things I disliked about it.

When I say Star Trek was bold I mean that Abrams and his crew had an early decision to make: they could tell an origin story that would have to conform to all the pre-existing, but post-dated material that’s already been established out there for years, or they could fly in the face of everything else that’s been said and done in the Star Trek universe and execute a complete re-boot on the franchise, and the latter is what they went with.  That decision made the film a lot more interesting and surprising than it likely would have been otherwise, and it let them take a cast of well-known characters and give them a new lease on life to take in whatever direction they choose.  This made for a few startling twists and events that made the movie very intriguing, because nothing that had once been set in stone could be considered untouchable anymore.  So bravo to Abrams for taking that kind of leap.

Now, unfortunately for me, I’m not a big fan in general of the plot device employed to pull this bold re-hash off: MINOR SPOILER ALERT (highlight for the info, which I promise is not giving away much): the plot pivots on a time-travel premise, spinning off an alternate universe than the one we have seen previously.  I’m not a fan of time-travel stories by rule, they’re always messy and seem to have a million logic holes.

Still, in spite of this one area that was a sticky point for me, the story was engaging and interesting throughout.

Perhaps the biggest victory for the whole enterprise (get it) was the casting of the principal characters, those we know from the old days.  I thought the young actors, Chris Pine in particular, did a fantastic job of bringing these characters to life in a realistic way, when it would have been all too easy to just do a hammy imitation of the old crew members.  It’s hard to describe this except to say that I felt like the actors got to know the motives behind the mannerisms and portrayed the characters from those much deeper waters, rather than just regurgitating the same old well-known quips and cliches, although the most famous lines found their way in appropriately.  So it was really fun to watch the young versions of those characters bloom as the story unfolded.  Of all of them, I thought Karl Urban’s Dr. “Bones” McCoy was the most copycat, which bugged me just a bit at first, but grew on me as the film progressed and he settled into the role.  Sulu, Uhura, Scotty, Spock and Kirk all did a great job of painting the picture of what these familiar characters might have been like at the beginning, and I think they did right by the material.

Star Trek was a big undertaking, and unlike some other properties of like magnitude that were reborn with less than stellar results, this one looks to have been given some new legs.  I hope Abrams and those who follow him take it down the path of some of the recent more successful rebirths so Star Trek will keep looking better than ever with age.

A Gaggle of Reviews

Thursday, May 7th, 2009

Catching up some more on my Netflix reviews, which are way behind by now:

Review: FireFly / Serenity

MightyThor’s Rating: 4 / 5 FireFly Class Spaceships

Some people call me a space cowboy

Firefly wasn’t on TV for long, but built a big cult following, and the fans of it are devoted.  I thought the show was pretty good, getting better as it went along, but the movie Serenity that spun off from it was excellent, one of the better Sci-Fi outings I’ve seen in a long time.  I recommend watching the TV show episodes first (there are only about 15 of them) to get the full flavor of the show, which really adds to the movie, but all in all, definitely worth watching.

Review: Eragon

MightyThor’s Rating: 2.5 / 5 Dragons

Thar be dragons here

It was a pretty average fantasy movie.  Honestly, it was better than I expected, and based on the terribly written book it was drawing from (which I could only choke down about half of), you might call it an admirable adaptation, but in the end it was no better than average.  I didn’t love it or hate it.

Review: The Last Legion

MightyThor’s Rating: 1.5 / 5 Excaliburs

This was a really lame movie from top to bottom.  You know how studios do that lame copycat thing where they release the same movies under different titles to piggyback off each other?  (Think Rob Roy vs. Braveheart, Wyatt Earp vs Tombstone, Volcano vs. Dante’s Peak, The Arrival vs. Independence Day etc.)  Well this was a really poor answer to King Arthur, I think.  The acting was lame, the fight coreography was innane, the plot was weak.  You’re casting Colin Firth as the lead action hero and hoping Sir Ben Kingsley can save the day by his mere presence, but unfortunately Kingsley’s credibility isn’t too high with me anymore after he somehow agreed to do Bloodrayne.  At any rate, skip this one.

Review: Twilight

MightyThor’s Rating: 2.5 / 5 Vampire Teeth

I vant to suck your blood, but I von't, because I love you, but I still vant to.

I was fully expecting to hate the crap out of this movie, because I read the book, and to put it kindly, I hated the crap out of it.  That’s not entirely fair.  In truth, I never should have read it, because I am clearly not the target audience, and whatever I have to say against it, Stephanie Meyers knows exactly who she’s writing for.  But I actually liked the movie better than the book, mostly because the movie was able to distill the pages and pages of teen vampire love angst (”Oh Edward!  Oh Edward!  He touched me, and my breath caught in my…*HURL!*) down into a manageable few moments.  There are still a lot of aspects of the whole Twilight story that come through in the same way that I hated from the book, but by virtue of cutting away all the excess to fit the story into a movie frame, the movie was much more tolerable than the book.

Review: Live Free or Die Hard

MightyThor’s Rating: 3.5 / 5 Exploding Computers

Yippe Kay Yay

Exploding computers, you ask?  Well yes, because that’s what this movie is, really.  The same old formula of Bruce Willis blowing stuff up or running from stuff blowing up, but this time, the enemy is a sophisticated and COMPLETELY PLAUSIBLE cyber-terrorist.  You just have to set aside all the ridiculousness of the plot and watch this movie for what it is: a glut of action.  I knew all along how awesomely lame the stunts and plot twists were, but I was quite entertained all the same, and I thought this one was better than Die Hard 2 and 3.

I have a few more to do, but this post is lengthy already, so I’ll add next ones another time.