“It’s Harry Potter meets Lord of the Rings!”
“It’s Friends with an edge!”
What do these two phrases have in common? The same thing as this season’s latest addition to “comparison condemnation”:
“If you like Lost and X-Files, you’ll love Fringe!”
In a few poorly-chosen words, these descriptions each spell the most heinous four-letter f-word in all of entertainment: Flop.
As a rule, any time the producers have to try to buy their audience by such overt comparisons to fan favorites of days gone by, it’s an indication that the show has no merit of its own and, despite their best efforts, will not appeal to the discerning viewer.
Such is definitely the case with the new Fox offering, Fringe. True to title, Fringe will not be joining the mainstream of television hits this season. My wife and I decided to give it a chance to pick up some of the TV entertainment void that has been left for several years by the exit of X-Files. Sadly, the two programs can’t even be mentioned in the same sentence.
X-Files was tremendously entertaining because it was smart. The dialogue was natural and believable. The actors were charismatic. You wanted to believe that they were real.
Fringe offers no such benefits. While the plot of the pilot episode was ok, the dialog was clunky, obviously over-laden with exposition of back stories and sub-plots that would be better left to viewer discovery. The characters are vanilla at best. The female lead, played in the pilot by Anna Torv, was bland and brought an annoying air of “seen it” to the role. There was nothing new or interesting about her; just another girl playing out of her depth as an FBI agent, like so many before her.
Maybe the biggest surprise (for some) that Fringe has to offer is that J.J. Abrams really is a one-trick pony, and apparently that trick is good old fashioned summer action movies. He really seemed to find his stride with Mission Impossible III, which I found very entertaining (considering it’s a Mission Impossible movie). Lost had its moments in the early seasons, but since then the story has gone in circles so many times, I have to agree with those who think the writers have no idea where they are going. Several times during the 30 minute experiment with Fringe (yes, 30 minutes…that’s as far as we made it) I honestly couldn’t tell if I was watching the new show or just a bad back-story episode of Lost. So many of the elements were lifted straight from the Lost template, right down to the weird horn crescendo that precedes every commercial break in both shows, you get the strong impression that Abrams just kind of mailed this one in.
Topping off the list of complaints is the experimental gimmicks that I can only assume were Abrams’ attempt to freshen the Lost model just enough to trick people into thinking it’s not the Lost model. There’s something very off-putting about having scene locations established by having to fly through the words “Logan Airport Boston” or having the words “Baghdad Iraq” laid out in large block letters across the tops of the buildings in a panoramic of the city. We watch TV to be taken away, to be drawn into the make-believe world that is being created on screen. Such lame gimmicks immediately smack you back to reality.
So, all in all, I found nothing of value in Fringe, not even a mild curiosity. The entire abbreviated experiment was nothing more than a waste of time. I can only be grateful I didn’t stick around for the full hour.